W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2008

Re: Deprecate Content-Location? (was RE: "Variant" language in Content-Location (Issue 109))

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:36:18 +0200
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, "'HTTP Wor king Group'" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1218116178.28467.26.camel@hlaptop.henriknordstrom.net>

ons 2008-08-06 klockan 15:32 +0200 skrev Julian Reschke:
> > I know. What I am trying to say is that plan doesn't work because "entity"
> > and "variant" mean two different things. I think "entity" could replace
> Do they?

2616 is inconsistent about the use of the two, so it's hard to say.. but
my mental picture of the two places entity at the protocol message level
with variant at a more semantical level.

It's an important distinction when talking about other messages than 200
responses to HEAD/GET.

Received on Thursday, 7 August 2008 13:35:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:13:37 UTC