Re: Issue 80, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST

On tis, 2008-07-29 at 16:20 -0400, Mark Baker wrote:

> In that case, I'm for Julian's proposal to simply remove "PUT or POST"
> in the last paragraph.

+1 on the first of those, where the server is still given persmission to
ignore Content-Location in requests, but not on the second where this
was removed.

In the definition of PUT there is the following restriction which
otherwise relates to Content-Location:

  "The recipient of the entity MUST NOT ignore any Content-* (e.g.
   Content-Range) headers that it does not understand or implement
   and MUST return a 501 (Not Implemented) response in such cases."


Received on Thursday, 31 July 2008 03:11:07 UTC