- From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:10:17 +0200
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On tis, 2008-07-29 at 16:20 -0400, Mark Baker wrote: > In that case, I'm for Julian's proposal to simply remove "PUT or POST" > in the last paragraph. +1 on the first of those, where the server is still given persmission to ignore Content-Location in requests, but not on the second where this was removed. In the definition of PUT there is the following restriction which otherwise relates to Content-Location: "The recipient of the entity MUST NOT ignore any Content-* (e.g. Content-Range) headers that it does not understand or implement and MUST return a 501 (Not Implemented) response in such cases." Regards Henrik
Received on Thursday, 31 July 2008 03:11:07 UTC