- From: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:04:51 -0500
- To: "'Yves Lafon'" <ylafon@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "'Dan Winship'" <dan.winship@gmail.com>, <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Yves Lafon wrote: > > field that is single-valued but erroneously repeated. If an > > intermediary combines two single-valued header fields > together then it > > could change the meaning of the request/response if the > combined value > > is also a legal value for that field (see > http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/93). > > If there an example of a repeated single-valued header that, > once folded in one list-valued header becomes legal? > Content-Length: 12 > Content-Length: 42 > is as illegal as > Content-Length: 12,42 Off the top of my head: Location, Content-Location, and Referer. Location: http://foo.com/a Location: http://foo.com/b Location: http://foo.com/a,http://foo.com/b Regards, Brian
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2008 15:05:29 UTC