Yves Lafon wrote: > > field that is single-valued but erroneously repeated. If an > > intermediary combines two single-valued header fields > together then it > > could change the meaning of the request/response if the > combined value > > is also a legal value for that field (see > http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/93). > > If there an example of a repeated single-valued header that, > once folded in one list-valued header becomes legal? > Content-Length: 12 > Content-Length: 42 > is as illegal as > Content-Length: 12,42 Off the top of my head: Location, Content-Location, and Referer. Location: http://foo.com/a Location: http://foo.com/b Location: http://foo.com/a,http://foo.com/b Regards, BrianReceived on Thursday, 28 August 2008 15:05:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:13:37 UTC