- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:13:26 +0200
- To: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>
- CC: 'Dave Cridland' <dave@cridland.net>, 'Anthony Bryan' <anthonybryan@gmail.com>, 'general discussion of application-layer protocols' <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, 'Applications Review List' <apps-review@ietf.org>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Brian Smith wrote: > Dave Cridland wrote: >> 1) I'm not mad keen on namespaces pointing to privately owned >> domain names. You have a different one in the examples as is >> specified in section 1.2, by the way. > > What namespace URI namespace should IETF specifications use? > urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:<name>? > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3553 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3688 That's one possible choice. Another one is to keep using HTTP URIs, but to move them to a more neutral location (purl.org has been used in the past, so has www.w3.org). BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2008 21:14:12 UTC