Julian Reschke wrote: > Brian Smith wrote: > > Judging from Roy's response, it looks like software won't have to > > understand more than ASCII, though they will have to tolerate > > non-ASCII bytes (presumably, regardless of whether those > > bytes can be decoded into valid characters in any encoding). > > Historically, ISO-8859-1 seems to be very difficult for > > implementers to get right since Windows-1252 and other similar > > encodings are often sent as ISO-8859-1. > > That's true. Not sure what point you're trying to make, > though? Do not mention ISO-8859-1 because some implementors > confuse it with different encodings? Yes. - BrianReceived on Sunday, 17 August 2008 15:24:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:13:37 UTC