Re: qvalue *

Sorry, sent before I was ready...  Here's the proposal:

| Note that "*" or similar wildcards depending on the
| Accept header fields are interpreted as "*;q=1".
| If a wildcard is associated with a non-zero <qvalue>,
| then equal or smaller non-zero <qvalue>s for other
| choices are in essence pointless.  Clients MAY assist
| users to avoid this scenario.

All variations of MAY are fine, e.g., SHOULD, or some
vaguer statement with "desirable" and "might".
 [Julian asked:]
> So why start here

Maybe adopt the proposal above, and be done with it.


Received on Monday, 4 August 2008 21:47:10 UTC