- From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:04:19 +0200
- To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On mån, 2008-08-04 at 20:07 +0200, Frank Ellermann wrote: > * and utf-8 have the same <qvalue>, and one of the two > can't be serious. Either * should be actuallly 0.001 > (here: anything less than 1 and 0.7, but not 0), or > utf-8 should be anything between 0.7 and 1, say 0.701 Yes, but where it the specification problem with this? > I see a problem, the <qvalue> of * is not smaller than > all other non-zero <qvalue>s. BTW, my IUT is an FF 2. What problem? For variants with the same qvalue the server is free to select one. a;q=0.5, *;q=0.5 is really not any different in principle from a;q=0.5, b;q=0.5 if available variants are 'a' or 'b'. > I didn't test any other UA, but it is fairly simple to > end up with a dubious <qvalue> for *, */*, or similar. And where is the problem we need to address? Regards Henrik
Received on Monday, 4 August 2008 22:05:01 UTC