Yves Lafon wrote: > >Or use a different header: Dojo-Range, with the response containing > >"Vary: Dojo-Range". That would make it cachable by generic HTTP > >caches, which sounds rather desirable. > > The "different header" will not explain what the meaning of the range is, > unless it is a standardized header meant to describe in general > range units. Range "items" doesn't explain what the meaning is either. It just gives a really vague idea. What kind of items? "Dojo-Range: 6 items" seems clearer. Are caches allowed (in principle) to split/merge these ranges, if they knew how? Would such caches operate on the item syntax - i.e. structured JSON in the message body? -- JamieReceived on Monday, 1 September 2008 14:12:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:13:37 UTC