Re: qvalue *

On tis, 2008-08-05 at 00:50 +0200, Frank Ellermann wrote:

> Oh, you found a plausible meaning for non-zero and smaller
> than *.  That is good, so far I assumed that this _must_ be
> erroneous.

But you did get the meaning of q=0 and smaller than *?

Regards
Henrik

Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2008 00:02:29 UTC