Re: i28 proposed replacement text

On lör, 2008-07-05 at 12:28 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> NEW:
> 
>     2.  If a Transfer-Encoding header field (Section 8.7) and the
>         "chunked" transfer-coding (Section 3.4) is used, the transfer-
>         length is defined by the use of that this transfer-coding.  If
>         the "chunked" transfer-coding is not present, the transfer-length
>         is defined by the sender closing the connection.

Hmm.. "is present" fell off somewhere.

        If a Transfer-Encoding header field (Section 8.7) is present and
        the "chunked" transfer-coding [...]
        
And to rule out any chance of people getting confused over "closing the
connection" one should perhaps overstate the Transfer-Encoding header..
last sentence again

        [...]. If a Transfer-Encoding header field is present and the
        "chunked" transfer-coding is not present, the transfer-length is
        defined by the sender closing the connection.

Regards
Henrik