Re: Strange "downref" to RFC2068 in description of 304 (new Issue 126) from Julian Reschke on 2008-08-05 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2008)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:25:36 +0200
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4898B740.9000400@gmx.de>

Julian Reschke wrote:
> ...
> (Historical note: that statement apparently was added in 
> draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-08)
> ...

Seems that this issue is related to proposed text in 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg-old/1997JanApr/0884.html>, 
which was added too verbatim to the RFC2068bis==RFC2616.

BR, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2008 20:26:20 UTC