Re: Issue 113, was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags)

Felix Sasaki wrote:
> 
> Julian Reschke さんは書きました:
>>
>> Julian Reschke wrote:
>>>
>>> Felix Sasaki wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>> RFC 4647 defines a basic language range in sec. 2.1 which is the 
>>>> same as the language range of sec. 14.4 of RFC 2616. Note also the 
>>>> information in sec. 2.1 of RFC 4647:
>>>> "Note that
>>>> the ABNF [RFC4234] in [RFC2616] is incorrect, since it disallows the
>>>> use of digits anywhere in the 'language-range' (see [RFC2616errata])."
>>>> So you could just refer to basic language ranges of RFC 4647 and be 
>>>> fine.
>>>> ...
>>>
>>> Indeed, thanks for pointing this out. I missed the fact that RFC 4647 
>>> defines basic ranges. Will make a concrete proposal later on.
>>
>> Proposed text:
> 
> looks fine to me as well. Re case-insensitive, see mail from Frank.
> 
> Felix
> ...

OK, applied with <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/303>.

BR, Julian

Received on Monday, 4 August 2008 10:23:23 UTC