- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:54:09 +1000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Looks good from here, and yes, this should be a WG item. Q: any more thoughts about whether to add things like safety, idempotence to the registry? Cheers, On 13/07/2008, at 2:48 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > > Julian Reschke wrote: >> ... >>> - an additional document, referencing Part 2, and making the >>> registrations for all other methods >> I can work on that, but we probably should discuss whether this is >> supposed to become a WG work item. >> ... > > Proposal: <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-http-method-registrations-latest.html > >. > > BR, Julian > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 14 July 2008 11:54:53 UTC