Re: #106: vary header type

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> 
> <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/106>
> 
> The Vary header doesn't say what type it is; seems like response header 
> is the most natural fit. Comments?

It is (and already appeared in the list of response headers somewhere 
else). Just clarifying the introduction...:

<http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/295>

BR, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2008 15:51:30 UTC