Ian Hickson wrote on 07/06/2008 06:19:20 PM: > > > At this point it seems to me that you are simply not interested in that > > case. Is this correct? > > I would love sniffing to go away altogether. I'm so interested in this > particular use case that HTML5 in fact supports it _despite_ this > requiring changes from the two biggest browsers. What more can I do? Perhaps something like this: Hey Erik! I read your post, and see that you have posted to the W3C mailing list: http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/07/02/ie8-security-part-v-comprehensive-protection.aspx http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Jul/0088.html I was wondering if you could expand on the use case that motivated this change, and if you can comment on whether there is any flexibility to discuss alternatives such as a new response header, to be implemented some time post IE8 Beta-2. > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' - Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 7 July 2008 01:32:43 UTC