- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:22:19 +0200
- To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
- CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Frank Ellermann wrote: > Yves Lafon wrote: > >> Can you point to a specific non-interoperable issue? >> The example you gave didn't seem hopelessly broken. > > | And <http://delorie.com:81/> tells me that it is in > | fact Accept-Charset: windows-1252,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7 > > * and utf-8 have the same <qvalue>, and one of the two > can't be serious. Either * should be actuallly 0.001 > (here: anything less than 1 and 0.7, but not 0), or > utf-8 should be anything between 0.7 and 1, say 0.701 > > Julian found a similar oddity with his UA: > > | Which UA? > | > | My FF3 says: > | > | Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7 > | > | ...so I don't see any problem here. > > I see a problem, the <qvalue> of * is not smaller than > all other non-zero <qvalue>s. BTW, my IUT is an FF 2. So FF sends a header that contains unnecessary information (include utf-8, where leaving it out would mean the same). I'm still not sure how this is a problem, unless you can show that this causes interop problems somewhere. > ... BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 4 August 2008 18:23:06 UTC