W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2008

RE: HTTPS URI scheme (i128), was: https URI scheme

From: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:38:02 -0500
To: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C4D0D7227B3D41C5AC03846B99CD2C77@T60>


The abstract of part 1 says that part 1 defines the HTTPS scheme, but
Section 3.2.2 says that another document defines it. I don't know how to
reword things to make it non-contradictory--maybe just take out "and HTTPS"
from the abstract?

Section 3.2.2 is titled "http URL". Because of the added reference to RFC
2818 for HTTPS, a new title would be better. I recommend "The HTTP and HTTPS
URI Schemes," to match the text in the abstract of part 1. Also, the
paragraph that says 'The "https" scheme is defined in [RFC2818].' would be
better off without the "Note:" prefix, since "Note:" doesn't actually mean

Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2008 19:38:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:13:37 UTC