Re: Strange "downref" to RFC2068 in description of 304 (new Issue 126)

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> tis 2008-08-05 klockan 22:25 +0200 skrev Julian Reschke:
>> Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> ...
>>> (Historical note: that statement apparently was added in 
>>> draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-08)
>>> ...
>> Seems that this issue is related to proposed text in 
>> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg-old/1997JanApr/0884.html>, 
>> which was added too verbatim to the RFC2068bis==RFC2616.
> 
> Seems so indeed.
> 
> And as it's clear what really should be referenced (internal reference
> to Date) i'd say it's an editorial issue.

Yes, I went ahead and fixed it in 
<http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/306>.

BR, Julian