- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:32:48 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>
- cc: 'Julian Reschke' <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, 'Dan Winship' <dan.winship@gmail.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Brian Smith wrote:
> field that is single-valued but erroneously repeated. If an intermediary
> combines two single-valued header fields together then it could change the
> meaning of the request/response if the combined value is also a legal value
> for that field (see http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/93).
If there an example of a repeated single-valued header that, once folded
in one list-valued header becomes legal?
Content-Length: 12
Content-Length: 42
is as illegal as
Content-Length: 12,42
(and more than likely to trigger a 400 reply)
--
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
~~Yves
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2008 14:33:22 UTC