On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Right now, cache range operations are independent of content type. Well, just because 'bytes' a pretty much independant of CT :) > (Btw, one can easily imagine ranges "characters", "xpath", "xquery", > "grep"... even "session". I'm not sure if that's a desirable road to > go down. Maybe it would be very useful.) I read ranges as "a part, possibly the whole part (0-) of a document" in the case of characters for text-based documents, it's ok, but grep, xpath won't be able to access the whole document using the "0-" syntax. But maybe even the way ranges are defined may change (after all it's defined as "byte-range-resp-spec" now), still I find this perverting the meaning of ranges and go in the transformation domain. -- Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras. ~~YvesReceived on Monday, 1 September 2008 15:02:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:13:37 UTC