w3c-dist-auth@w3.org from January to March 2002 by author

akhil gupta

• [w3c-dist-auth] <none> (Tuesday, 5 March)

Andreas Jung

• Microsoft webfolders WebDAV incompatibility issues (Friday, 15 March)

Babich, Alan

• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Saturday, 2 March)
• RE: Source header instead of property? (was Re: A case for GETSR C (or other mechanism to that effect)) (Friday, 1 March)
• RE: space (Friday, 1 March)
• RE: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties (Sunday, 24 February)
• RE: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties (Tuesday, 19 February)
• RE: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties (Monday, 18 February)
• DANGER!! (Tuesday, 15 January)

CJ Holmes

• RE: WebDAV Matrix (Monday, 18 March)
• RE: Translate (was RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: Translate (was RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: Translate (was RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Translate (was RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)) (Monday, 4 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Monday, 4 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Monday, 4 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Saturday, 2 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Saturday, 2 March)
• DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Friday, 1 March)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Friday, 1 March)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Friday, 1 March)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Thursday, 28 February)
• A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Thursday, 28 February)

Clemm, Geoff

• RE: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services (Friday, 22 March)
• RE: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services (Friday, 22 March)
• RE: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services (Thursday, 21 March)
• RE: RFC2518 issue: format for multistatus when no property report ed at all (Thursday, 7 March)
• RE: RFC2518bis: xml:lang (2.6) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Saturday, 2 March)
• RE: Source header instead of property? (Friday, 1 March)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Friday, 1 March)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Friday, 1 March)
• RE: Source header instead of property? (was Re: A case for GETSR C (or other mechanism to that effect)) (Friday, 1 March)
• RE: Source header instead of property? (was Re: A case for GETSR C (or other mechanism to that effect)) (Friday, 1 March)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Friday, 1 March)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties (Sunday, 24 February)
• RE: IETF meeting: Refreshing locks (Saturday, 23 February)
• RE: read/write privileges (Saturday, 23 February)
• RE: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties (Saturday, 23 February)
• RE: RFC2518 ambiguity on creationdate/lastmodifieddate (Friday, 8 February)
• RE: RFC2518 ambiguity on creationdate/lastmodifieddate (Friday, 8 February)
• RE: RFC2518 ambiguity on creationdate/lastmodifieddate (Thursday, 7 February)
• RE: RFC2518 ambiguity on creationdate/lastmodifieddate (Thursday, 7 February)
• RE: Issue: DAV_WITH_COLON_IS_NOT_A_URI (Thursday, 7 February)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Tuesday, 22 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Tuesday, 22 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Friday, 18 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Friday, 18 January)
• RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 14 January)
• RE: root of a lock, was HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 14 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Tuesday, 8 January)

Daniel Brotsky

• Re: WebDAV and Service Location Protocol (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: rfc2518 issue: DEFER_LOCK_NULL_RESOURCES_IN_SPEC (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: rfc2518 issue: DEFER_LOCK_NULL_RESOURCES_IN_SPEC (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: rfc2518 issue: DEFER_LOCK_NULL_RESOURCES_IN_SPEC (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: LOCK_URL_WITH_NO_PARENT_COLLECTION (Friday, 15 February)
• re: rfc2518 issue: DEFER_LOCK_NULL_RESOURCES_IN_SPEC (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: root of a lock, was HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: RFC2518 ambiguity on creationdate/lastmodifieddate (Wednesday, 13 February)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 14 January)
• RE: root of a lock, was HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 14 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Wednesday, 9 January)
• RE: Webdav issue: UNLOCK_BY_NON_LOCK_OWNERS (Monday, 7 January)

Dennis E. Hamilton

• RE: How do I make my app DAV-aware? (Thursday, 10 January)

Elias Sinderson

• WebDAV DB question (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: WebDav question (Thursday, 24 January)

Eric Sedlar

• Re: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Monday, 4 March)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Monday, 4 March)
• RE: href in where clause (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Thursday, 10 January)

Erik Seaberg

• Re: space (Sunday, 3 March)
• Re: Source header instead of property? (Friday, 1 March)
• Source header instead of property? (was Re: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect)) (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: [dav-dev] Problem with OfficeXP and Accented characters (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Wednesday, 9 January)

Frank Biederich

• RE: Shared locks (Monday, 4 March)

gclemm@rational.com

• RE: Issue: IS_HREF_A_CHILD_OF_KEEPALIVE (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: Issue: IS_HREF_A_CHILD_OF_KEEPALIVE (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Sunday, 27 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Sunday, 27 January)
• RE: need clarification about COPY to locked resource response cod e (Friday, 25 January)

Greg Stein

• Re: how to specify extension features in response to OPTIONS request (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Speaking at conference (Zurich, March 21, 22) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [dav-dev] Problem with OfficeXP and Accented characters (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: RFC2518 ambiguity on creationdate/lastmodifieddate (Saturday, 9 February)
• Re: Is KEEPALIVE worth keeping? (Saturday, 9 February)
• Re: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Tuesday, 8 January)

hanna.ji@pg.com

• Re: Windows XP Webdav redirector (Monday, 14 January)

Henrik Genssen

• Re: Database-based webDAV server (Friday, 11 January)

Hermann, Eckehard

• read/write privileges (Thursday, 21 February)

hugh

• Authoring Web Service (Wednesday, 27 March)

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-ordering-protocol-02.txt (Friday, 29 March)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-00.txt (Thursday, 21 February)

Jason Crawford

• Re: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services (Thursday, 21 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Friday, 1 March)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Issue: DUPLICATE_PROPERTIES (Wednesday, 27 February)
• RE: [dav-dev] Re: Problem with OfficeXP and Accented characters (Sunday, 24 February)
• Re: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties (Wednesday, 20 February)
• IETF meeting: Refreshing locks (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: LOCK_URL_WITH_NO_PARENT_COLLECTION (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: Is KEEPALIVE worth keeping? (Monday, 11 February)
• RE: RFC2518 ambiguity on creationdate/lastmodifieddate (Thursday, 7 February)
• Is KEEPALIVE worth keeping? (Monday, 4 February)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Thursday, 31 January)
• Issue: IS_HREF_A_CHILD_OF_KEEPALIVE (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Saturday, 26 January)
• RE: Multiple resourcetypes? (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Saturday, 19 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Friday, 18 January)
• RE: root of a lock, was HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 14 January)
• RE: root of a lock, was HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 14 January)
• RE: root of a lock, was HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Sunday, 13 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Tuesday, 8 January)
• RE: Webdav issue: UNLOCK_BY_NON_LOCK_OWNERS (Sunday, 6 January)

Jim Luther

• Re: Help me please with idisk (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: WebDAV Matrix (Monday, 18 March)
• Mac OS X WebDAV file system (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: Whatever happened with Partial PUTs (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Whatever happened with Partial PUTs (Monday, 4 February)

Jim Whitehead

• RE: Outlook Web Access (Friday, 29 March)
• FW: [Moderator Action] Webdav Search with IIS (Friday, 29 March)
• RE: Unsubscribing... (Thursday, 21 March)
• RE: how to specify extension features in response to OPTIONS request (Wednesday, 20 March)
• FW: [Moderator Action] WebDAV WG minutes (Wednesday, 20 March)
• FW: Help me please with idisk (Monday, 18 March)
• RE: WebDAV Matrix (Friday, 15 March)
• FW: WebDAV Help!!! (Friday, 15 March)
• FW: WebDAV Matrix (Friday, 15 March)
• RFC 3253 - Versioning Extensions to WebDAV (Friday, 8 March)
• RE: [w3c-dist-auth] <none> (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Using DAV to save files (Tuesday, 5 March)
• FW: Newbie Question on WebDAV/Tomcat (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Monday, 4 March)
• FW: COPY-Method over the Web (Monday, 4 March)
• RE: Features of WEBDAV (Wednesday, 27 February)
• RE: Windows XP Webdav redirector (Wednesday, 27 February)
• WG Meeting at Minneapolis IETF 53 (Wednesday, 27 February)
• WG: Features of WEBDAV (Wednesday, 27 February)
• RE: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties (Saturday, 23 February)
• Re: [dav-dev] Re: Problem with OfficeXP and Accented characters (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: Problem with OfficeXP and Accented characters (Friday, 22 February)
• RE: Shared locks (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: MOVE command fails with 502 bad gateway on apache server (Wednesday, 20 February)
• WebDAV book authors (Tuesday, 19 February)
• RE: Is KEEPALIVE worth keeping? (Monday, 4 February)
• FW: Multiple resourcetypes? (Friday, 25 January)
• FW: WebDav question (Thursday, 24 January)
• re: [dav-dev] re: ms ie/office/web folder behaviors with webdav (Monday, 21 January)
• FW: Searching folders with WebDAV (Monday, 21 January)
• FW: Wikified WebDAV documentation site (Saturday, 19 January)
• RE: DASL client (Thursday, 17 January)
• FW: Help on Dav Explorer (Wednesday, 16 January)
• FW: How do I make my app DAV-aware? (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Friday, 4 January)
• FW: implementation of WebDAV with Web Folders (Wednesday, 2 January)

Joachim Feise

• Re: How do you get the URL of a MS web folder? (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: Anyone have any MS web folder/Rosebud sample code? (Friday, 22 March)
• RE: Searching folders with WebDAV (Tuesday, 22 January)

Joe Orton

• Re: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Monday, 4 March)

John Glavin

• MOVE command fails with 502 bad gateway on apache server (Wednesday, 20 February)

Josh

• Re: Issue: DAV_WITH_COLON_IS_NOT_A_URI (Thursday, 7 February)

Julian Reschke

• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-ordering-protocol-02.txt (Friday, 29 March)
• Internet Draft Submission: draft-reschke-webdav-allprop-include-01 (Thursday, 28 March)
• WebDAV properties vs. variants (Friday, 22 March)
• RE: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services (Friday, 22 March)
• RE: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services (Friday, 22 March)
• RFC2518bis, was: [Moderator Action] WebDAV WG minutes (Thursday, 21 March)
• status of efforts, was: [Moderator Action] WebDAV WG minutes (Thursday, 21 March)
• RE: how to specify extension features in response to OPTIONS request (Wednesday, 20 March)
• WebDAV Ordered Collections Protocol (draft-ietf-webdav-ordering-protocol) (Monday, 11 March)
• RE: RFC2518 issue: format for multistatus when no property report ed at all (Friday, 8 March)
• RFC2518 issue: format for multistatus when no property reported at all (Thursday, 7 March)
• RE: Translate (was RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: Translate (was RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: Translate (was RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Monday, 4 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Monday, 4 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Monday, 4 March)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Monday, 4 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Monday, 4 March)
• RE: space (Sunday, 3 March)
• RE: space (Sunday, 3 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Saturday, 2 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Saturday, 2 March)
• RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Saturday, 2 March)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Saturday, 2 March)
• RE: Source header instead of property? (was Re: A case for GETSR C (or other mechanism to that effect)) (Friday, 1 March)
• xml:space (Friday, 1 March)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Friday, 1 March)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Thursday, 28 February)
• FW: href in where clause (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: RFC2518 issue: DAV:href format (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: Features of WEBDAV (Thursday, 28 February)
• RFC2518 issue: DAV:href format (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: RFC2518bis: allprop deprecated (4.1) (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Thursday, 28 February)
• shared locks and IIS, was: Shared locks (Tuesday, 26 February)
• RE: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties (Sunday, 24 February)
• RE: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties (Saturday, 23 February)
• RE: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties (Friday, 22 February)
• RE: Shared locks (Thursday, 21 February)
• RFC2518bis: allprop deprecated (4.1) (Thursday, 21 February)
• RFC2518bis: xml:lang (2.6) (Thursday, 21 February)
• RE: [dav-dev] Problem with OfficeXP and Accented characters (Wednesday, 20 February)
• RE: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties (Tuesday, 19 February)
• RE: rfc2518 issue: DEFER_LOCK_NULL_RESOURCES_IN_SPEC (Tuesday, 19 February)
• RE: rfc2518 issue: DEFER_LOCK_NULL_RESOURCES_IN_SPEC (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties (Monday, 18 February)
• RE: rfc2518 issue: DEFER_LOCK_NULL_RESOURCES_IN_SPEC (Monday, 18 February)
• RE: RFC2518 ambiguity on creationdate/lastmodifieddate (Friday, 8 February)
• RE: RFC2518 ambiguity on creationdate/lastmodifieddate (Friday, 8 February)
• RE: RFC2518 ambiguity on creationdate/lastmodifieddate (Thursday, 7 February)
• RE: Issue: DAV_WITH_COLON_IS_NOT_A_URI (Thursday, 7 February)
• Issue: DAV_WITH_COLON_IS_NOT_A_URI (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Datatypes for WebDAV properties (internet draft draft-reschke-webdav-property-datatypes-01) (Friday, 1 February)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 28 January)
• new (well, old) issue to be added to issues list: keepalive (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: RFC2518: depth XML element: Infinite (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: RFC2518: depth XML element: Infinite (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Saturday, 26 January)
• RE: Multiple resourcetypes? (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: need clarification about COPY to locked resource response cod e (Friday, 25 January)
• need clarification about COPY to locked resource response code (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: Searching folders with WebDAV (Monday, 21 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Saturday, 19 January)
• RE: [Q] - making a Win32 app DAV-aware... (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: Windows XP Webdav redirector (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 14 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 14 January)
• Windows XP Webdav redirector (Monday, 14 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 14 January)
• RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Tuesday, 8 January)

Larry Masinter

• RE: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services (Thursday, 21 March)
• RE: [dav-dev] Re: Problem with OfficeXP and Accented characters (Sunday, 24 February)

Lisa Dusseault

• RE: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services (Thursday, 21 March)
• WebDAV and Service Location Protocol (Wednesday, 20 March)
• WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services (Wednesday, 20 March)
• RE: Shared locks (Friday, 1 March)
• New draft: RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 20 February)
• RE: rfc2518 issue: DEFER_LOCK_NULL_RESOURCES_IN_SPEC (Monday, 18 February)
• RE: rfc2518 issue: DEFER_LOCK_NULL_RESOURCES_IN_SPEC (Sunday, 17 February)
• Shared locks (Saturday, 16 February)
• RE: Whatever happened with Partial PUTs (Monday, 4 February)
• RE: Issue: IS_HREF_A_CHILD_OF_KEEPALIVE (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Tuesday, 22 January)
• RE: Searching folders with WebDAV (Tuesday, 22 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 14 January)
• RE: How do I make my app DAV-aware? (Thursday, 10 January)
• FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Wednesday, 9 January)

Matt Timmermans

• RE: Windows XP Webdav redirector (Monday, 14 January)
• RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Wednesday, 9 January)

Matthieu Chevrier

• RE: Help me please with idisk (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Saturday, 2 March)

Michael Datuin

• How do you get the URL of a MS web folder? (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Anyone have any MS web folder/Rosebud sample code? (Friday, 22 March)
• [Q] - making a Win32 app DAV-aware...(continued)... (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Q] - making a Win32 app DAV-aware... (Tuesday, 15 January)

Peter Raymond

• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Thursday, 28 February)
• Missing <status> elements from examples in the DeltaV specificati on (Thursday, 24 January)

phillip.lindsay@day.com

• RE: A case for GETSRC (or other mechanism to that effect) (Thursday, 28 February)

Pill, Juergen

• RFC2518: depth XML element: Infinite (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Wednesday, 9 January)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: Translate (was RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC)) (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Saturday, 2 March)

Sander Bos

• Newbie question about LOCK (Tuesday, 26 February)

Sascha Boehm

• Internal Server Error 500 (Monday, 25 March)

Simon Hill

• Database-based webDAV server (Thursday, 10 January)
• Problems with Intercepting WebDAV with IIS to simulate filesystem with a DB (Monday, 7 January)

Siva Jayasenan

• Unsubscribing... (Thursday, 21 March)

Soumya Dasgupta

• Slide Project (Friday, 18 January)

Stefan Eissing

• Re: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: WebDAV and Open Pluggable Edge Services (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: Source header instead of property? (was Re: A case for GETSR C (or other mechanism to that effect)) (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: [dav-dev] Re: Problem with OfficeXP and Accented characters (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: IETF meeting: Refreshing locks (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: [dav-dev] Problem with OfficeXP and Accented characters (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: [dav-dev] Problem with OfficeXP and Accented characters (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: rfc2518 issue: DEFER_LOCK_NULL_RESOURCES_IN_SPEC (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: rfc2518 issue: DEFER_LOCK_NULL_RESOURCES_IN_SPEC (Friday, 15 February)
• RE: Issue: IS_HREF_A_CHILD_OF_KEEPALIVE (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods? (Wednesday, 9 January)

Steve Lomicka

• DASL client (Wednesday, 16 January)
• RE: Database-based webDAV server (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Problems with Intercepting WebDAV with IIS to simulate filesystem with a DB (Tuesday, 8 January)

Sung Kim

• RE:DASL client (Friday, 18 January)

Tim Ellison

• Re: Missing <status> elements from examples in the DeltaV specificati on (Thursday, 24 January)

Vasta, John

• RE: href in where clause (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: RFC2518 issue: DAV:href format (Thursday, 28 February)

Yaron Y. Goland

• Re: RFC 3253 - Versioning Extensions to WebDAV (Friday, 8 March)

Last message date: Friday, 29 March 2002 08:09:43 UTC