W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:51:04 +0100
To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCKEOPDMAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:44 PM
> To: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
> Subject: RE: HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
> 
> 
>    From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]
> 
>    Well, if the set of principals with the ability to unlock the
>    resource is bigger than one, why not report all of them (or a
>    subset whicht the server thinks makes sense)?
> 
> That's exactly what the DAV:acl property would do (i.e.
> the ACEs for DAV:can-unlock).

Yes,

but we don't have a standard privilege for this, right?
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2002 10:51:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:59 GMT