W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: Translate (was RE: DAV-Enabled field (was RE: A case for GETSRC))

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 02:58:34 -0800
To: CJ Holmes <cholmes@4d.com>
Cc: DAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20020308025834.C1859@waka.wakasoft.com>
> No, I don't agree that this is a problem.  In most cases it is the 
> _desired_ effect because users generally only use DAV for messing 
> with their source, and they don't care about using DAV with the 
> output.  But they _do_ want to use the same URLs for both editing 
> source and viewing output.  If the administrator wants something 
> different he should be able to configure his server accordingly.

You are saying that the protocol should have a one-to-one correspondence
with the way that a client application presents information to the user.
I am saying that the protocol must be unabiguous and compatible with
HTTP/1.1, but that doesn't stop the client from presenting it to the
user as if they were the same resource.  The only difference is the URL,
which is something an authoring client can and will present to the user in
a way that is meaningful to that user.  DAV is the access mechanism, not the
user interface.

Received on Friday, 8 March 2002 06:03:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:25 UTC