> Don't expect this to be handled by changes to HTTP > or URI specifications. It's good to know this. > It is important for the WebDAV group to come up with > a WebDAV spec that defines character encodings for > file names and the relationship of filenames and encodings > to URL strings. Please forgive me if I'm being dense, but isn't this out of the realm of WebDAV? Although there have been some exceptions when people said a given feature was unimplementable, we've usually said that we are only officially concerned with server behaviors that are exposed to and testable/verifyable by a WebDAV client. If we agree that this is still our philosophy, and that the use of files in an implementation is not visible to a client, then perhaps instead of adding it to the base webdav spec, someone should draft an RFC on this apart from WebDAV that documents and resolves this issue. J. ------------------------------------------ Phone: 914-784-7569, ccjason@us.ibm.comReceived on Sunday, 24 February 2002 18:04:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:59 GMT