W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: Issue: DAV_WITH_COLON_IS_NOT_A_URI

From: Josh <josh@bluescreen.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 01:31:08 -0800
Message-ID: <005901c1afba$2cb91730$5f00a8c0@wolverine>
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Jason Crawford" <ccjason@us.ibm.com>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
This is an interesting point.  It makes me wonder what a better
solution would have been ?  Im not suggesting invalidating the
current scheme, but Im curious, what would be the right
way to do it if we had the choice today ?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
To: "Jason Crawford" <ccjason@us.ibm.com>; <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 2:44 AM
Subject: Issue: DAV_WITH_COLON_IS_NOT_A_URI


> Jason,
>
> I think we should add: "if a decision is made not to change the namespace
> name for DAV, the new spec should explain that a) defining a new URI
scheme
> and b) using the scheme name as namespace name were bad design decisions
and
> shouldn't be repeated".
>
> (I mention this because I just found yet another example of this abuse,
and
> it seems to be inspired by WebDAV)
>
> Julian
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2002 04:34:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:59 GMT