W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2002


From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 09:34:25 -0800
To: "Jason Crawford" <ccjason@us.ibm.com>, "Daniel Brotsky" <dbrotsky@adobe.com>
Cc: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@Rational.Com>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

> Geoff, Julian, are we sure we can't just define DAV:owner (rather than a
> new field) more restrictively to comply with your Julian's proposal?

We can't redefine DAV: owner.  As you suggest, there are current deployed
uses of DAV:owner and there would indeed be transition issues.

> Lisa, Geoff, Julian, Can you think out the interoperability scenarios and
> issues of Julian's proposal?  (I wasn't at the interops so I'm
> not familiar
> with the current uses of DAV:owner and how Julian's proposal affects the
> currently deployed systems and if there are transition issues.)

Received on Monday, 28 January 2002 12:40:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:24 UTC