W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:30:37 -0500
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B103F8AEA9@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
It probably makes sense to include both,
i.e. "better support for pipelining" and "transactions"
I personally am more optimistic that we can agree on
an interoperable way of improving pipelining than that we
can agree on an interoperable way of doing transactions.

Cheers,
Geoff

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Brotsky [mailto:dbrotsky@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 6:46 PM
To: Jim Whitehead
Cc: WebDAV
Subject: RE: Interest in standardizing Batch methods?


At 9:57 AM -0800 1/9/02, Jim Whitehead wrote:
>  > That said, it's still not clear batch methods are so necessary they'd
>>  preempt other work we've got to do.
>
>I agree that other work, especially the revision of RFC 2518, has higher
>priority than this.  But, since we'll be revising our charter soon, I was
>mostly interested to see if it should be added as a charter to-do item.
>
>- Jim

I would say "yes" if you phrase it in terms of general 
transactionality, not batch operations in particular.

     dan
-- 
Daniel Brotsky, Adobe Systems
tel 408-536-4150, pager 877-704-4062
2-way pager email: <mailto:page-dbrotsky@adobe.com>
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2002 12:31:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:59 GMT