W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2002


From: <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 23:10:47 -0500
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B105A31CA3@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
That is fine with me.  


-----Original Message-----
From: Lisa Dusseault [mailto:lisa@xythos.com]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 7:42 PM
To: Daniel Brotsky; Julian Reschke
Cc: Jason Crawford; Clemm, Geoff; w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org; Julian Reschke

> Bottom line: At this point, I think our two points of consensus are:
> 1. DAV:owner is owned by clients, and the spec should say this.
> 2. We are not going to add a way for clients to ask who owns a lock.
> I would suggest we close out this issue on that consensus.  


So my position is pretty similar to Dan's: make it clear that DAV:owner is
owned by clients, and don't add any way for servers to insert lock owner
principal information.  I prefer any other extensions to DAV to be done
outside the base spec since they are clearly not needed for basic
interoperability and would delay Draft Standard.
Received on Monday, 28 January 2002 23:11:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:24 UTC