running programs popoola samuel (Friday, 31 January)
The src attribute Sjoerd Visscher (Sunday, 26 January)
suggestion Vlad Giszpenc (Friday, 24 January)
confused Willard (Friday, 24 January)
just checking Doug (Wednesday, 22 January)
div & span Ben-Nes Michael (Friday, 17 January)
Echo Zeldman Cory Shubert (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Bertilo Wennergren (Tuesday, 14 January)
- Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Daniel Glazman (Tuesday, 14 January)
- Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Christoph Päper (Tuesday, 14 January)
- Re[2]: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Alexander Savenkov (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: Re[2]: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Boris Zbarsky (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: Re[2]: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful David Woolley (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful fantasai (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Toby A Inkster (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful fantasai (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP] (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful John Lewis (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re[2]: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Alexander Savenkov (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP] (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful fantasai (Friday, 17 January)
- Re[2]: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Alexander Savenkov (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: Re[2]: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Tantek Çelik (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: Re[2]: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Christoph Päper (Thursday, 16 January)
- XHTML 2.0 considered harmless (was: Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful) John Lewis (Thursday, 16 January)
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Chris Mannall (Wednesday, 15 January)
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Jonas Jørgensen (Thursday, 16 January)
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Daniel Glazman (Thursday, 16 January)
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Boris Zbarsky (Thursday, 16 January)
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful John Lewis (Thursday, 16 January)
RE: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Jelks Cabaniss (Tuesday, 14 January)
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Rick [Kitty5] (Tuesday, 14 January)
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Rie Beam (Tuesday, 14 January)
RE: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Peter Foti (PeterF) (Wednesday, 15 January)
RE: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Peter Foti (PeterF) (Wednesday, 15 January)
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Jonny Axelsson (Thursday, 16 January)
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Jonny Axelsson (Thursday, 16 January)
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Daniel Glazman (Thursday, 16 January)
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Daniel Glazman (Thursday, 16 January)
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Daniel Glazman (Thursday, 16 January)
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Lachlan Cannon (Thursday, 16 January)
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Boris Zbarsky (Thursday, 16 January)
Fw: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Ineke van der Maat (Thursday, 16 January)
HTML DTD Dervla O'Keeffe (Friday, 10 January)
CSS alignment Niklas Wahlberg (Tuesday, 7 January)
IFrame Resets PERUGINI, MICHAEL (SWBT) (Tuesday, 7 January)
RE: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Peter Foti (PeterF) (Tuesday, 7 January)
RE: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Peter Foti (PeterF) (Tuesday, 7 January)
RE: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Peter Foti (PeterF) (Wednesday, 8 January)
Last message date: Friday, 31 January 2003 15:02:10 UTC