- From: Jonas Jørgensen <jonasj@jonasj.dk>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 18:10:40 +0100
- To: www-html@w3.org
Jim Dabell wrote: >>>>Assuming DOM support, there is no real need for >>>><noscript> - and only modern, future browsers will >>>>support XHTML 2 you may assume this >>> >>>I would respectfully strongly disagree; even using the most >>>modern browser(s), I still operate with JavaScript disabled >>>by default >> >>I don't understand your argument. Why do you think XHTML 2.0 needs the >><noscript> element? > > Well perhaps I have misunderstood, but your argument appears to be that > there is no reason to cater to XHTML 2.0 user-agents that don't process > scripts. Or are you saying that there is a better way of rendering content > for only non-script-processing user-agents? Yes: Write your document the way you want it to look for user-agents without scripting, then use scripts to hide the stuff you don't want user-agents with scripting to show. /Jonas
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2003 12:10:42 UTC