- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:34:56 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Daniel Glazman <glazman@netscape.com>
- Cc: "www-html@w3.org" <www-html@w3.org>
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Daniel Glazman wrote: > > Ian Hickson wrote: > > > My bad, I misread "should" for "could". > > > > In any case, I still don't understand what your point was. Could you > > explain what you meant in > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2003Jan/0176.html > > > > ...? > > If the spec normatively says that the element generates a line break > before and after, how can this be overriden ? It should just say the > element is block-level and its recommended default style is 'display: > block'. That's enough. The spec says "SHOULD", which leaves some lee-way. However, I agree that the spec should be slightly looser. All I can say is that it certainly makes a change: with HTML4 I always used to say that it was too loose and not strict enough! I'll send the review comment to the editors. -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL "meow" /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2003 06:34:58 UTC