Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2

On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:42:31 -0600, John Lewis <lewi0371@mrs.umn.edu> 
wrote:

>> I don't see a strong reason to take <h1-6> out, and so IMO it should
>> be preserved for backwards-compatability.

> XHTML 2.0 isn't supposed to be backwards compatible. I think that's a
> good argument for keeping h1-h6 in XHTML 1.2 (or whatever it will be
> called).


It hasn't set out to be backwards incompatible either.

I agree that features should have reason to be in XHTML 2.0, but there has 
been given many good use cases for h1-h6, and they cause no harm.


There are no plans, and no charter, for an XHTML 1.2.

-- 
Jonny Axelsson,
Web Standards,
Opera software

Received on Thursday, 23 January 2003 12:13:35 UTC