- From: Micah Dubinko <MDubinko@cardiff.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:23:58 -0800
- To: "'Boris Zbarsky'" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, Mikko Rantalainen <mira@cc.jyu.fi>
- Cc: Daniel Glazman <glazman@netscape.com>, www-html@w3.org
Hi everybody, The flawed assumption in this argument is that the only choices are to have a 'style' attribute or not. There are many other possibilities, for instance <style> elements allowed outside the head, nesting, etc. Couldn't we brainstorm on some other alternatives? Binary choices are so limiting! :-) .micah -----Original Message----- From: Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbarsky@MIT.EDU] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:04 AM To: Mikko Rantalainen Cc: Daniel Glazman; www-html@w3.org Subject: Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful > You cannot copy and paste *content with the styling information only* if > the target medium is sematic one, like (X)HTML. Period. While this may be what you would like to be the case, in the real world (of wysiwyg HTML editors, which you probably think cannot exist either) this situation is not necessarily acceptable. You _do_ want to be able to copy a paragraph out of an HTML e-mail and into a document you're writing and (optionally) preserve the style. Boris -- Windows 95: (noun): 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that can't stand 1 bit of competition.
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 16:25:17 UTC