- From: Peter Foti (PeterF) <PeterF@SystolicNetworks.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 14:21:26 -0500
- To: "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
> > <Ian> > > * If a user saves an XHTML-as-text/html document to disk and later > > reopens it locally, triggering the content type sniffing > code since > > filesystems typically do not include file type information, the > > document could be reopened as XML, potentially resulting in > > validation errors, parsing differences, or styling differences. > > </Ian> > > > > > > It depends on what application the user has associated with the file > > extension, does it not? If the user saves the file with a > .htm extension, > > then his/her HTML User Agent will most likely be the one to > open the file. > > Extension? What extension? On Windows, perhaps, but not on > other OSes. Magic > number detection is a lot more likely on Unix, eg (especially > since there is > really no good reason to give the file a ".htm" extension > when saving it, since > almost all software I know of will deal with a filename > without an extension > (again, on Unix)). Yes, I was referring to Windows (or more precisely, GUI OSes where you would open a file by (double)clicking the icon of the file). Hadn't really thought about purely text-based OSes. -Pete
Received on Tuesday, 7 January 2003 14:11:30 UTC