- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 06:56:05 +0000 (GMT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
> impression that XHTML 1.0 was equivalent to HTML 5.0, but had a fancy name It would be more like 4.02, as the intention was not to make changes other than those forced by XML.
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 01:56:10 UTC