- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 09:58:32 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Daniel Glazman <glazou_2000@yahoo.fr>
- Cc: "www-html@w3.org" <www-html@w3.org>
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Daniel Glazman wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: >> >> I don't understand what you mean by this. The spec doesn't talk about >> carriage returns or line feeds. The only normative part of the spec >> you just quoted is "The l element contains a sub-paragraph that >> represents a sinle line of text". >> >> The informative part, indicating how to render it, merely says "It >> contains a piece of text that when visually represented should start >> on a new line, and have a line break at the end", which is perfectly >> well handled by 'display:block'. > > Section 8 of XHTML2 WD says "this section is normative". > and nothing in section 8.10 says its first paragraph is informative. > The "normative" of section 8 applies to 8.10 too. My bad, I misread "should" for "could". In any case, I still don't understand what your point was. Could you explain what you meant in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2003Jan/0176.html ...? -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL "meow" /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2003 04:58:35 UTC