- From: Joris Huizer <joris_huizer@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:49:07 -0800 (PST)
- To: Daniel Glazman <glazman@netscape.com>, Jelks Cabaniss <jelks@jelks.nu>
- Cc: "'www html w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
--- Daniel Glazman <glazman@netscape.com> wrote: > > Jelks Cabaniss wrote: > > >>>It also dumps the extremely useful 'style' > attribute > >> > >>Except for quick-n-dirty CSS test suites I can't > see any use > >>for it. It's fully replacable by id + CSS, too. > > > > > > And class + CSS. > > No. It is not fully replacable since any solution > with an > ID or a class implies a restriction on the ID or > class > namespace. The remarkable fact about the style > attribute > is that it implies no restriction of that kind. > > </Daniel> > Styles which are so random that no overall class/ID combo can be thought of to make it work without the style attributes are probably kind of rare - and I'm kind of sure pages like that are not really high quality :-P __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2003 15:49:09 UTC