- From: (wrong string) äper <christoph.paeper@tu-clausthal.de>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 19:00:29 +0100
- To: "W3 HTML Mailing List" <www-html@w3.org>
kelvSYC: > On 1/21/03 6:17 PM, "Christoph P*per" <christoph.paeper@tu-clausthal.de> > >>> I was hoping <param> could go under any element as its first >>> children, seeing that <object> is pretty much universal now... >> >> What about nested objects? > > <div src="..."> > <param ... /> > <div src="..."> > <param ... /> > </div> > </div> All of those would probably always be shown (like IE handles object nowadays). Object does have semantic meaning, div has not, except that it groups its children "somehow". A p with src attribute would still be a paragraph, meaning that not all kind of possible sources were correct to use. > Isn't this what <object> does in the first place? Object includes "stuff" into the document and provides mechanisms to aid doing this (several attributes and the param element). Hey! I didn't notice that in the current draft caption is a valid child of object, at least according to the minimal content model: (caption?,(PCDATA | Flow | param)*) Christoph Päper
Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2003 13:00:29 UTC