Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful

Ian Hickson wrote:

> My bad, I misread "should" for "could".
> 
> In any case, I still don't understand what your point was. Could you
> explain what you meant in
> 
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2003Jan/0176.html
> 
> ...?

If the spec normatively says that the element generates a line break
before and after, how can this be overriden ? It should just say the
element is block-level and its recommended default style is 'display:
block'. That's enough.

</Daniel>

Received on Thursday, 16 January 2003 05:56:25 UTC