- From: Nick Boalch <nick@fof.durge.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 18:33:31 +0000
- To: www-html@w3.org
Devon Y. wrote: >> Some [1] would argue that there is no point in working in XHTML until >> it can reliably be interpreted when delivered as text/xml. www-talk >> has seen lengthy discussion on this issue. > > As far as I know, it's reliably interpreted by user agents' that > support it. Indeed. However, this appears currently to mean Gecko-based browsers and recent versions of Opera, a relatively small proportion of the total. >> [1] <URL: http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml>, for example. > > Think I've read this before. It only talks about why one shouldn't send > XHTML as text/html, right? More or less. It's conclusion is that XHTML delivered as text/html is broken and XHTML delivered as text/xml is risky, so authors intending their work for public consumption should stick to HTML 4.01. Cheers, N. -- Nick Boalch <URL:http://users.durge.org/~nick/>
Received on Monday, 6 January 2003 13:36:06 UTC