- From: Joris Huizer <joris_huizer@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 02:05:57 -0800 (PST)
- To: kelvSYC <kelvsyc@shaw.ca>, Chris Mannall <chris.mannall@hecubagames.com>
- Cc: W3 HTML Mailing List <www-html@w3.org>
--- kelvSYC <kelvsyc@shaw.ca> wrote: > > Point taken about <style>. What about <script> and > <noscript>? Compared to > other tags, this seems prehistoric. Is there any > advantage to keeping these > two? > Well, I must say it'd be a lot cleaner to have: <link rel="script" src="scr.js" type="application/x-javascript"> Than the current: <script type="application/x-javascript" src="scr.js"></script> But removing script without another way to embed scripts it would probably mean you'd loose a lot of webdesigners on it. Assuming DOM support, there is no real need for <noscript> - and only modern, future browsers will support XHTML 2 you may assume this regards, Joris __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2003 05:05:58 UTC