- From: Devon Y. <vehementpetal@hotmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 03:10:07 -0500
- To: mpoe@cs.hmc.edu, www-html@w3.org
>------- mjumbe said: > >What might be better is to use the <dfn> element as if everything inside of >the <dfn> and </dfn> tags were the definition of some term. Then if a ><term> element were introduced, the two elements together would be able to >be used to portray much more than the <dfn> element can alone. If that were the case, the <term/> & it's associated <dfn/> could be anywhere in a document, and connected via id & href attributes? I like that idea. You might like to read - http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/def.html#markup ...which delves into how definitions could be marked up better. I found it very interesting. Not sure if it's really right for XHTML's direction (but that's not my decision either), but I read it recently and am thinking of doing something like it for my own personal XML use. Devon _________________________________________________________________ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Received on Thursday, 30 January 2003 03:11:01 UTC