- From: Rick [Kitty5] <rick@kitty5.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:24:56 -0000
- To: "www html w3.org" <www-html@w3.org>
Tantek Çelik wrote: > In case anyone here hasn't seen this yet, if you have any interest in > XHTML > 2.0, Mark Pilgrim's frank comments are worth a read: > > http://diveintomark.org/archives/2003/01/13.html#semantic_obsolescence XHTML2 is turning into a purists dream that in all certainty will never gain wide spread acceptance. Every browser that will support XHTML2 will support every incarnation of HTML right back to year dot as well, and all but the most serious dedicated professionals are going to continue using what ever mark-up they feel like - especially if XHTML2 proves difficult to work with, browser vendors will be more likely to produce more propriety mark-up to bridge what inexperienced developers see as gaps in the specification. -- Rick Kitty5 NewMedia http://Kitty5.co.uk POV-Ray News & Resources http://Povray.co.uk TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037 PGP Public Key http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2003 10:22:56 UTC