- From: Jonas Jørgensen <jonasj@jonasj.dk>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:51:05 +0100
- To: www-html@w3.org
Toby A Inkster wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 10:28:11PM +0100, Petr Baudis wrote: > | However, wouldn't it be a wise requirement for each new version of > | (X)HTML to have at least one compliant implementation _prior_ to the > | release? > > How could this be done though? How could a browser maker implement a > standard that has not yet been published? I believe Petr meant prior to moving from Proposed Recommendation to Recommendation. (Or from Candidate Recommendation to Recommendation -- I always forget which one comes first, and I'm too lazy to check.) > Besides, as Opera and Mozilla have fairly decent XML+CSS engines, and > XHTML is and XML application, you could consider Opera and Mozilla to > already support XHTML to a degree. I consider Opera and Mozilla's XHTML support better than "to a degree". /Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2003 18:51:08 UTC