Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2

Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP] wrote:
>>Assuming DOM support, there is no real need for
>><noscript> - and only modern, future browsers will
>>support XHTML 2 you may assume this
> 
> I would respectfully strongly disagree; even using the most
> modern browser(s), I still operate with JavaScript disabled
> by default

I don't understand your argument. Why do you think XHTML 2.0 needs the 
<noscript> element?

/Jonas

Received on Thursday, 23 January 2003 10:38:08 UTC