www-html@w3.org from January 2003 by date

Friday, 31 January 2003

Re: WD-css3-text-20021024 substantive comments Tantek Çelik
Re: running programs Toby A Inkster
Re: WD-css3-text-20021024 substantive comments Christoph P�per
running programs popoola samuel
Re: input type= file problems Boris Zbarsky

Wednesday, 29 January 2003

input type= file problems mfmartin@med2.unex.es

Thursday, 30 January 2003

Re: Tag Proposal: DATE Christoph P�per
Re: script tag - archive attribute Stephen Battey
Re: modification of the <dfn> element fantasai
Re: modification of the <dfn> element Devon Y.
Re: Tag Proposal: DATE David Woolley
Re: Recommended Processing model for NOSCRIPT element David Woolley
modification of the <dfn> element Mjumbe Ukweli

Tuesday, 28 January 2003

Recommended Processing model for NOSCRIPT element seshadri te

Thursday, 30 January 2003

Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Russell O'Connor
Tag Proposal: DATE Jared Warren
Re: Marking Up Acronym and Abbreviations Christoph P�per

Wednesday, 29 January 2003

Re: Marking Up Acronym and Abbreviations Simon Jessey
Re: Marking Up Acronym and Abbreviations Sampo Syreeni
Re: Marking Up Acronym and Abbreviations Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]
Re: Marking Up Acronym and Abbreviations David Woolley

Tuesday, 28 January 2003

Re: Marking Up Acronym and Abbreviations David Woolley

Wednesday, 29 January 2003

define a goal for xhtml Lorenzo De Tomasi

Tuesday, 28 January 2003

I think I had an error sending... Sending again... (IE handling of XHTML doctype and namespace) Richard Norman
Re: Marking Up Acronym and Abbreviations Simon Jessey
IE handling of XHTML doctype and namespace (sample) Richard Norman
IE handling of XHTML doctype and namespace Richard Norman
Re: IFRAME placed in wrong DTD Boris Zbarsky
Re: Marking Up Acronym and Abbreviations Toby A Inkster
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Mikko Rantalainen
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Petr Baudis
Marking Up Acronym and Abbreviations Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design
Re: IFRAME placed in wrong DTD Toby A Inkster
Re: IFRAME placed in wrong DTD Andrei Zlate-Podani
Re: IFRAME placed in wrong DTD Andrei Zlate-Podani
Re: [OT] Pages won't validate as XHTML because of Char Encoding David Woolley
Re: Pages won't validate as XHTML because of Char Encoding Simon Jessey
[OT] Re: Pages won't validate as XHTML because of Char Encoding Jim Dabell
Pages won't validate as XHTML because of Char Encoding Aziz Matar

Monday, 27 January 2003

Re: IFRAME placed in wrong DTD David Woolley
Re: IFRAME placed in wrong DTD oOÕ --- Le Castor --- ÕOo
Re: IFRAME placed in wrong DTD Toby A Inkster
Re: XHTML doctype and namespace lookups overwhelm w3.org servers? Jonas Jørgensen

Sunday, 26 January 2003

IFRAME placed in wrong DTD Andrei Zlate-Podani
The src attribute Sjoerd Visscher
Re: XHTML doctype and namespace lookups overwhelm w3.org servers? Boris Zbarsky
Re: XHTML doctype and namespace lookups overwhelm w3.org servers? Gannon J. Dick
Re: XHTML doctype and namespace lookups overwhelm w3.org servers? Gannon J. Dick
Re: XHTML doctype and namespace lookups overwhelm w3.org servers? Simon Jessey
Re: XHTML doctype and namespace lookups overwhelm w3.org servers? Jonas Jørgensen
Re: XHTML doctype and namespace lookups overwhelm w3.org servers? Joris Huizer
Re: XHTML doctype and namespace lookups overwhelm w3.org servers? Webmaster, Musikcafeen

Friday, 24 January 2003

re: confused Simon Jessey
Re: confused Herr Christian Wolfgang Hujer
Re: suggestion Lorenzo De Tomasi
RE: suggestion Vlad Giszpenc
Re: suggestion Boris Zbarsky
suggestion Vlad Giszpenc
confused Willard
Re: table and ol combi Johannes Koch
Re: table and ol combi Joris Huizer
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 David Woolley
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 John Lewis
Re: table and ol combi Christoph Päper
Re: MIME links [was: self-contained html file format] Josh Haberman
Re: script tag - archive attribute Roland Bluethgen

Thursday, 23 January 2003

Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Joris Huizer
Re: script tag - archive attribute Boris Zbarsky
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Jonny Axelsson
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Jonny Axelsson
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Jonas Jørgensen
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Jim Dabell
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Jim Dabell
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]
Re: script tag - archive attribute Jonas Jørgensen
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Jonas Jørgensen
Re: script tag - archive attribute Roland Bluethgen
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]
table and ol combi Joris Huizer
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Joris Huizer
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Joris Huizer
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Joris Huizer

Monday, 20 January 2003

script tag - archive attribute Stephen Battey

Thursday, 23 January 2003

Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 John Lewis

Wednesday, 22 January 2003

Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Mjumbe Ukweli
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Toby A Inkster
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Christoph P�per
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 kelvSYC
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 kelvSYC
just checking Doug
[OT] IE 6 and the data: URL scheme Jonas Jørgensen
Re: MIME links [was: self-contained html file format] Jonny Axelsson
Re: self-contained html file format Roland Bluethgen
RE: self-contained html file format Manoj Varghese thomas
MIME links [was: self-contained html file format] Vix
Re: self-contained html file format Boris Zbarsky
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 John Lewis
self-contained html file format Josh Haberman
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Christoph P�per
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 kelvSYC
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 kelvSYC

Tuesday, 21 January 2003

Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Jonas Jørgensen
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 David Woolley
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 fantasai
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Christoph P�per
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Ian Hickson
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Christoph P�per
Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 Chris Mannall

Monday, 20 January 2003

Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2 David Woolley
My thoughts on XHTML 2 Kelvin Chung

Sunday, 19 January 2003

Re: External links in XHTML 1.1 Christoph P�per

Friday, 17 January 2003

VeriPic(R) News Jean Joe

Saturday, 18 January 2003

Re: External links in XHTML 1.1 Simon Jessey
Reserved frame names in non-strict HTML 4.01/XHTML 1.0 William F Hammond
Re: External links in XHTML 1.1 Roland Bluethgen
Re: External links in XHTML 1.1 David Woolley
Re: External links in XHTML 1.1 Etan Wexler
Re: External links in XHTML 1.1 Jonas Jørgensen
Re: External links in XHTML 1.1 Simon Jessey
Re: External links in XHTML 1.1 Jonas Jørgensen

Friday, 17 January 2003

External links in XHTML 1.1 Simon Jessey
Re: application/xhtml+xml Toby A Inkster
Re: application/xhtml+xml Nick Boalch
Re: application/xhtml+xml Boris Zbarsky
define a goal for xhtml Lorenzo De Tomasi
RE: div & span Simon Jessey
Re: application/xhtml+xml Timothy Luoma
Re: application/xhtml+xml Masayasu Ishikawa
Re: application/xhtml+xml Ineke van der Maat
Re: application/xhtml+xml Tom Gilder
Re: div & span Roland Bluethgen
Re: div & span Jonas Jørgensen
div & span Ben-Nes Michael
Re: <note> may be a good idea... was (Proposal for XHTML 2.0: The <footnote> element) Jonas Jørgensen
Re: Form controls outside of form blocks C.Bottelier
Re: application/xhtml+xml Toby A Inkster
Re: application/xhtml+xml Masayasu Ishikawa
Re: Form controls outside of form blocks David Woolley
Re: xhtml2 and user groups David Woolley
Re: application/xhtml+xml Timothy Luoma
Form controls outside of form blocks Shaddy Baddah
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful fantasai
Re: <note> may be a good idea.. Richard Norman

Thursday, 16 January 2003

Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]
Re[2]: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Alexander Savenkov
Re: <note> may be a good idea... was (Proposal for XHTML 2.0: The <footnote> element) Alexander Savenkov
Re: application/xhtml+xml Richard Norman
Re: xhtml2 and user groups Lorenzo De Tomasi
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful John Lewis
ANN: xml-hypertext mailing list Simon St.Laurent
Re: HTML to XHTML translator Jesus Arias Fisteus
Re: xhtml2 and user groups Albert Lunde
Fw: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Ineke van der Maat
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Boris Zbarsky
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]
Re: HTML to XHTML translator Vix
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Boris Zbarsky
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Boris Zbarsky
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Boris Zbarsky
application/xhtml+xml Nick Boalch
define a goal for xhtml [it was: 'different uses of xhtml' & 'xhtml2 and user groups'] Lorenzo De Tomasi
<note> may be a good idea... was (Proposal for XHTML 2.0: The <footnote> element) Richard Norman
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful fantasai
RE: XHTML 2.0: Stay the course Richard Norman
xhtml2 and user groups Veith Risak
Re: different uses of xhtml Lorenzo De Tomasi
RE: XHTML 1.0 Table Problem Chris J. Norman
RE: XHTML 1.0 Table Problem Jon Haworth
XHTML 1.0 Table Problem Aziz Matar
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Daniel Glazman
We don't need the style attribute Ian Hickson
Re: different uses of xhtml Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Jonny Axelsson
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Ian Hickson
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Daniel Glazman
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Lachlan Cannon
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Jonas Jørgensen
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Daniel Glazman
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Daniel Glazman
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Ian Hickson
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Daniel Glazman
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Daniel Glazman
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Daniel Glazman
Re: Re[2]: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Christoph P�per
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Chris Mannall
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Toby A Inkster
Re: Three design-related (HTML or CSS) elements for your consideration Christoph P�per
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Christoph P�per
Re: different uses of xhtml David Woolley
Re: Re[2]: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful David Woolley
Re: Copying HTML David Woolley
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful David Woolley
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Christoph P�per
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Christoph P�per
Re: different uses of xhtml Christoph P�per
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Albert Lunde
Re: Copying HTML fantasai
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Tantek Çelik
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful fantasai
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Jonny Axelsson
Re: XHTML 2.0: Stay the course Tantek Çelik
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful John Lewis
XHTML 2.0 considered harmless (was: Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful) John Lewis
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Jonny Axelsson
Re: Re[2]: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Tantek Çelik
different uses of xhtml Lorenzo De Tomasi
Re: What is wrong with xhtml 1.0? Jonas Jørgensen

Wednesday, 15 January 2003

Re: Re[2]: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Boris Zbarsky
Re: Alternatives to 'style' attribute? Boris Zbarsky
Re: Proposal for XHTML 2.0: The <footnote> element Jonas Jørgensen
Re: Re[4]: Proposal for XHTML 2.0: The <footnote> element Lorenzo De Tomasi
Re: Three design-related (HTML or CSS) elements for your consideration Boris Zbarsky
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Ian Hickson
Re[2]: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Alexander Savenkov
Re[2]: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Alexander Savenkov
Re[4]: Proposal for XHTML 2.0: The <footnote> element Alexander Savenkov
XHTML 2.0: Stay the course Micah Dubinko
RE: Alternatives to 'style' attribute? Peter Foti (PeterF)
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Gannon J. Dick
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Sampo Syreeni
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Petr Baudis
RE: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Sampo Syreeni
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Daniel Glazman
Alternatives to 'style' attribute? Micah Dubinko
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful fantasai
RE: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Tim Bagot
RE: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Tim Bagot
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Daniel Glazman
RE: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Peter Foti (PeterF)
Re: Three design-related (HTML or CSS) elements for your consideration Rob Larsen
Re: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Jonathan Chetwynd
RE: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Sampo Syreeni
Re: Three design-related (HTML or CSS) elements for your consideration Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]
Re: HTML to XHTML translator Andrew McFarland
Re: Three design-related (HTML or CSS) elements for your consideration Rob Larsen
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Braden McDaniel
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Boris Zbarsky
Re: Three design-related (HTML or CSS) elements for your consideration Rob Larsen
Re: Three design-related (HTML or CSS) elements for your consideration Jim Dabell
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Boris Zbarsky
Style attribute (was: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful) Mikko Rantalainen
RE: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Peter Foti (PeterF)
Re: Three design-related (HTML or CSS) elements for your consideration Christoph P�per
What is wrong with xhtml 1.0? Chris Casciano
Re: Three design-related (HTML or CSS) elements for your consideration Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]
Re: Three design-related (HTML or CSS) elements for your consideration Sampo Syreeni
Re: Style attribute and BR vs L (was: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful) Wingnut
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Mikko Rantalainen
Re: Three design-related (HTML or CSS) elements for your consideration Rob Larsen
Re: Proposal for XHTML 2.0: The <footnote> element fantasai
RE: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful) Richard Norman
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Tantek Çelik
Re: Three design-related (HTML or CSS) elements for your consideration Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]
Re: Three design-related (HTML or CSS) elements for your consideration Aaron Webb
Re: Three design-related (HTML or CSS) elements for your consideration Rob Larsen
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Mikko Rantalainen
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Daniel Glazman
Re: Three design-related (HTML or CSS) elements for your consideration Mikko Rantalainen
Re: Three design-related (HTML or CSS) elements for your consideration Jonas Jørgensen
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Jonas Jørgensen
Re: Three design-related (HTML or CSS) elements for your consideration Daniel Glazman
Re: Style Attribute (Was: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful) Simon Hill
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Mikko Rantalainen
Re: Proposal for XHTML 2.0: The <footnote> element Jonas Jørgensen
Style attribute and BR vs L (was: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful) Mikko Rantalainen
Echo Zeldman Cory Shubert
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Chris Mannall
Re: Three design-related (HTML or CSS) elements for your consideration Jonas Jørgensen
Three design-related (HTML or CSS) elements for your consideration Thomas W. Krafft
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Tantek Çelik
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Mikko Rantalainen
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Daniel Glazman
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Ian Hickson
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Daniel Glazman
Re: Re[2]: Proposal for XHTML 2.0: The <footnote> element Ian Hickson
Re[2]: Proposal for XHTML 2.0: The <footnote> element Alexander Savenkov
Re: Proposal for XHTML 2.0: The <footnote> element Alexander Savenkov
Re[2]: Proposal for XHTML 2.0: The <footnote> element Alexander Savenkov
Re: Proposal for XHTML 2.0: The <footnote> element Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]
Re: Proposal for XHTML 2.0: The <footnote> element Jonas Jørgensen

Tuesday, 14 January 2003

HTML to XHTML translator Jesus Arias Fisteus

Wednesday, 15 January 2003

Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful David Woolley
Re: (too) special markup (was: Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful) David Woolley
Re: XHTML 1.0 = HTML 5.0? (was Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful) David Woolley

Tuesday, 14 January 2003

Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful David Woolley

Wednesday, 15 January 2003

XHTML 1.0 = HTML 5.0? (was Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful) Devon Y.
Re: Campaign for new SHORTTAG in HTML 4 William F Hammond
Re: Proposal for XHTML 2.0: The <footnote> element Christoph P�per
Re: Proposal for XHTML 2.0: The <footnote> element Lorenzo De Tomasi
Re: Proposal for XHTML 2.0: The <footnote> element Herr Christian Wolfgang Hujer
Re: Proposal for XHTML 2.0: The <footnote> element Lorenzo De Tomasi
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Boris Zbarsky
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Toby A Inkster

Tuesday, 14 January 2003

Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Jonas Jørgensen
Proposal for XHTML 2.0: The <footnote> element Jonas Jørgensen
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Toby A Inkster
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Rie Beam
Re: (too) special markup (was: Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful) Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]
Re: (too) special markup (was: Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful) Daniel Glazman
Re: (too) special markup (was: Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful) Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]
RE: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Jelks Cabaniss
Re: (too) special markup (was: Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful) Jonas Jørgensen
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Petr Baudis
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Joris Huizer
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Daniel Glazman
Campaign for new SHORTTAG in HTML 4 Russell O'Connor
RE: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Jelks Cabaniss
RE: (too) special markup (was: Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful) Jelks Cabaniss
RE: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Jelks Cabaniss
RE: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Jelks Cabaniss
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Mikko Rantalainen
Re[2]: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Alexander Savenkov
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Rick [Kitty5]
(too) special markup (was: Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful) Bertilo Wennergren
RE: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Simon Jessey
Re: HTML DTD Masayasu Ishikawa
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Christoph P�per
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Masayasu Ishikawa
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Tantek Çelik
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Christoph P�per
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Jonas Jørgensen
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Christoph P�per
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Daniel Glazman
Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Bertilo Wennergren
XHTML 2.0 considered harmful Tantek Çelik

Sunday, 12 January 2003

Re: ABBR support (was Re: Promotion of XHTML) Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]
Re: ABBR support (was Re: Promotion of XHTML) Sander Tekelenburg

Friday, 10 January 2003

Re: DTD and schema - what's the difference? Nick Boalch
RE: DTD and schema - what's the difference? Richard Norman
Re: Promotion of XHTML Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]
Re: DTD and schema - what's the difference? Ron Woodall
HTML forms and HTTP/WebDAV requests Frans Dondorp
Re: Promotion of XHTML Russell O'Connor
HTML DTD Dervla O'Keeffe
Re: Promotion of XHTML Etan Wexler
Goldfarb dancing on a pin head Etan Wexler

Thursday, 9 January 2003

Re: DTD and schema - what's the difference? David Woolley
Re: DTD and schema - what's the difference? Nick Boalch
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Ian Hickson
RE: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Ian Hickson
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Boris Zbarsky
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Toby A Inkster

Wednesday, 8 January 2003

Re: Duplicated web page contents David Woolley
Re: IFrame Resets David Woolley

Thursday, 9 January 2003

DTD and schema - what's the difference? Ron Woodall

Wednesday, 8 January 2003

RE: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Robert Koberg
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Nick Boalch
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Boris Zbarsky
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Toby A Inkster
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Boris Zbarsky
Re: Default Submit Button Ted Callander
RE: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Peter Foti (PeterF)
Re: Duplicated web page contents Andrew Clover
Re: Duplicated web page contents Steven Pemberton
Proposed additions to XHTML 1.0 Appendix C (was Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it?) Tantek Çelik
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]
Re: IFrame Resets HectorCS
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Ian Hickson
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Toby A Inkster
Re: Duplicated web page contents David Woolley
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? David Woolley
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? David Woolley
Re: Duplicated web page contents Boris Zbarsky
Re: Duplicated web page contents Russell O'Connor
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Ian Hickson
Duplicated web page contents John Greenwood
RE: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Ian Hickson

Tuesday, 7 January 2003

Re: CSS alignment Nick Boalch
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Boris Zbarsky
Re: Promotion of XHTML Boris Zbarsky
RE: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Peter Foti (PeterF)
RE: Promotion of XHTML Richard Norman
RE: Promotion of XHTML Russell O'Connor
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Boris Zbarsky
RE: Promotion of XHTML Peter Foti (PeterF)
RE: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Peter Foti (PeterF)
CSS alignment Niklas Wahlberg
RE: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Peter Foti (PeterF)
IFrame Resets PERUGINI, MICHAEL (SWBT)
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Boris Zbarsky
Re: ABBR support (was Re: Promotion of XHTML) Tantek Çelik
Re: ABBR support Christoph P�per
ABBR support (was Re: Promotion of XHTML) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? SCJessey@aol.com
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]
SGML relationships Ron Woodall
Re: Promotion of XHTML Tantek Çelik

Wednesday, 1 January 2003

Re: Promotion of XHTML Sander Tekelenburg

Tuesday, 7 January 2003

Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Ian Hickson
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? David Woolley
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? David Woolley

Monday, 30 December 2002

RE: Promotion of XHTML Russell O'Connor

Tuesday, 7 January 2003

Re: client-side include Russell O'Connor
Re: client-side include David Woolley
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Tantek Çelik
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Ian Hickson
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Christoph P�per
Re: comments on 2002-12-12 XHTML 2.0 WD Douglas Livingstone
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Boris Zbarsky
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Tantek Çelik

Monday, 6 January 2003

RE: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Ian Hickson
Re: client-side include David Woolley
RE: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Peter Foti (PeterF)
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Nick Boalch
Re: W3C MarkUp Area Richard Norman
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Ian Hickson
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Nick Boalch
Re: client-side include Andrew Clover
Re: client-side include Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Devon Y.

Sunday, 5 January 2003

Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Nick Boalch
Re: client-side include Boris Zbarsky
Re: client-side include Tim Bagot
Re: client-side include David Woolley
Re: client-side include Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Brant Langer Gurganus
Re: client-side include John Lewis
Re: client-side include David Dorward
Re: client-side include Curtis C. Hovey
Re: client-side include Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]
HTML or XHTML - why do you use it? Devon Y.
Re: client-side include Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: W3C MarkUp Area Christoph Schneegans
client-side include Jonathan Chetwynd
Re: <hr /> and WD-xhtml2-20021218 Devon Y.
Re: Promotion of XHTML Devon Y.

Saturday, 4 January 2003

Re: W3C MarkUp Area Gannon J. Dick
Re: W3C MarkUp Area Mario Torres
Re: ' Named Character Reference Ian Hickson
' Named Character Reference Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design
W3C MarkUp Area Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design

Thursday, 2 January 2003

Re: get selection from screen Brant Langer Gurganus
Re: get selection from screen Toby A Inkster
Re: <hr /> and WD-xhtml2-20021218 David Woolley
get selection from screen li zhang cis student
Re: Promotion of XHTML Gannon J. Dick
Re: Promotion of XHTML Claus Färber
Re: Promotion of XHTML Douglas Livingstone
RE: XHTML 2.0 - <line> or <l>? Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design
Re: Promotion of XHTML John Lewis
Re: Promotion of XHTML David Woolley

Wednesday, 1 January 2003

Re: <hr /> and WD-xhtml2-20021218 Douglas Livingstone
Re: Promotion of XHTML Douglas Livingstone
Re: XHTML 2.0 - <line> or <l>? Mikko Rantalainen
Re: comments on 2002-12-12 XHTML 2.0 WD Mikko Rantalainen
remove redundant title element Brant Langer Gurganus
Re: <hr /> and WD-xhtml2-20021218 Toby Inkster
Re: <hr /> and WD-xhtml2-20021218 Toby Inkster

Last message date: Friday, 31 January 2003 15:02:10 UTC