XHTML 1.0 = HTML 5.0? (was Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful)

>I strongly suggest dropping all "XHTML 2.0" efforts in favor of a new
>"xHTML 5.0" language.

Wait a minute. Now I'm confused. All this time I've been under the 
impression that XHTML 1.0 was equivalent to HTML 5.0, but had a fancy name 
'cause of the XML syntactic changes. The comment above, if I understand it 
right, seems to imply otherwise. So, Huh?


Devon


_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM: Try the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 00:49:53 UTC