Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful

Bertilo Wennergren <bertilow@gmx.net> wrote:

> One of the main point so Mark's criticism is the surprising 
> disappearance of the "cite" element. It was there in the 5 August 
> draft, but was left out of the 11 December draft - with no explanation.
> 
> Actually I suspect this was just a mistake. I think "cite" was not meant 
> to be deleted.

Indeed it will be put back in the next draft.

Regards,
-- 
Masayasu Ishikawa / mimasa@w3.org
W3C - World Wide Web Consortium

Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2003 09:14:36 UTC