public-vocabs@w3.org from May 2013 by date

Friday, 31 May 2013

• Re: ISSUE-17: schema.org has NGO, EducationalOrganization, SportsTeam, GovernmentOrganization but not Labo[u]r Union Karen Coyle
• Re: ISSUE-17: schema.org has NGO, EducationalOrganization, SportsTeam, GovernmentOrganization but not Labo[u]r Union Martin Hepp
• Re: Proposal: Slideset Martin Hepp

Thursday, 30 May 2013

• Comments on Reservations, Orders drafts (was Re: Schema.org update: new and updated proposals) Dan Brickley

Wednesday, 29 May 2013

• Re: SemTechSF next week? Gregg Kellogg
• Re: SemTechSF next week? Wallis,Richard
• Re: webschema-ISSUE-22 (openingHours x2): Schema.org has two ways to express opening hours [Feedback on Schema.org] Dan Brickley
• Re: webschema-ISSUE-22 (openingHours x2): Schema.org has two ways to express opening hours [Feedback on Schema.org] Adrian Giurca
• Re: SemTechSF next week? Barry Norton
• Re: webschema-ISSUE-22 (openingHours x2): Schema.org has two ways to express opening hours [Feedback on Schema.org] Bernard Vatant
• thoughts on an updated activitystrea.ms James M Snell
• Re: SemTechSF next week? Aaron Bradley
• RE: SemTechSF next week? Evain, Jean-Pierre

Tuesday, 28 May 2013

• Re: SemTechSF next week? Roger Macdonald

Wednesday, 29 May 2013

• Re: SemTechSF next week? John Erickson

Tuesday, 28 May 2013

• Re: SemTechSF next week? Arthur Keen
• Re: SemTechSF next week? Phil Archer
• Re: SemTechSF next week? Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: ISSUE-17: schema.org has NGO, EducationalOrganization, SportsTeam, GovernmentOrganization but not Labo[u]r Union David Marin
• Re: SemTechSF next week? Dan Brickley
• SemTechSF next week? Dan Brickley
• Re: Activity Proposal Review Jim Klo
• Re: webschema-ISSUE-22 (openingHours x2): Schema.org has two ways to express opening hours [Feedback on Schema.org] Wallis,Richard
• RE: Activity Proposal Review Evain, Jean-Pierre
• Re: Activity Proposal Review Guha
• Re: webschema-ISSUE-22 (openingHours x2): Schema.org has two ways to express opening hours [Feedback on Schema.org] Matthias Tylkowski
• Re: marking up quotation types Dan Brickley
• webschema-ISSUE-22 (openingHours x2): Schema.org has two ways to express opening hours [Feedback on Schema.org] Web Schemas TF Issue Tracker

Monday, 27 May 2013

• Re: Proposal: Promote 'citation' property up to CreativeWork Maori Ito

Friday, 24 May 2013

• Re: Some comments on Actions Bo Ferri
• Re: Actions in Schema.org: target & object properties Bo Ferri
• Re: Proposal: Promote 'citation' property up to CreativeWork Karen Coyle
• Re: Proposal: Promote 'citation' property up to CreativeWork Maori Ito
• Re: Some comments on Actions Yaar Schnitman

Thursday, 23 May 2013

• Re: Activity Proposal Review Yaar Schnitman
• RE: Activity Proposal Review Yaar Schnitman
• Re: Actions in Schema.org: target & object properties Yaar Schnitman
• RE: Actions in Schema.org - Potential vs Performed Actions Yaar Schnitman
• Re: Proposal: Promote 'citation' property up to CreativeWork Karen Coyle
• RE: Activity Proposal Review Evain, Jean-Pierre
• Re: Proposal: Promote 'citation' property up to CreativeWork Maori Ito

Wednesday, 22 May 2013

• Re: Activity Proposal Review Karen Coyle
• Activity Proposal Review James M Snell

Tuesday, 21 May 2013

• Activity proposal and activitystrea.ms James M Snell

Monday, 20 May 2013

• Re: Actions in Schema.org: target & object properties James M Snell
• Re: Actions in Schema.org and ActivityStrea.ms James M Snell

Friday, 17 May 2013

• Re: Official OWL version outdated Bo Ferri
• Re: Actions in Schema.org - Potential vs Performed Actions Yaar Schnitman
• Re: Some comments on Actions Bo Ferri
• Re: Official OWL version outdated Holger Knublauch
• Re: Official OWL version outdated Bo Ferri
• Some comments on Actions Leigh Dodds

Thursday, 16 May 2013

• Actions in Schema.org: target & object properties Yaar Schnitman
• Actions in Schema.org and ActivityStrea.ms Yaar Schnitman
• Re: Actions in Schema.org - Potential vs Performed Actions Yaar Schnitman
• Actions in Schema.org - Potential vs Performed Actions Yaar Schnitman

Friday, 17 May 2013

• Re: Actions in Schema.org: target & object properties Yaar Schnitman
• Re: Actions in Schema.org - Potential vs Performed Actions Yaar Schnitman

Thursday, 16 May 2013

• Re: Actions in Schema.org Yaar Schnitman

Friday, 17 May 2013

• Re: schema.org contentLocation question Martin Hepp
• Re: Schema for Transport Data Martin Hepp
• Re: Actions in Schema.org - Potential vs Performed Actions Jim Klo
• Re: Official OWL version outdated Holger Knublauch
• Re: Actions in Schema.org: target & object properties Jim Klo

Thursday, 16 May 2013

• Re: Actions in Schema.org and ActivityStrea.ms Jim Klo
• Re: Actions in Schema.org - Potential vs Performed Actions Jim Klo
• Re: Schema for Transport Data Mr. Nice Guy
• Re: Official OWL version outdated Bo Ferri
• Re: schema.org contentLocation question Alexander Shubin

Wednesday, 15 May 2013

• Re: 'Using schema.org markup for organization logos' (google blog) Dan Brickley
• Re: 'Using schema.org markup for organization logos' (google blog) Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: Official OWL version outdated Holger Knublauch
• 'Using schema.org markup for organization logos' (google blog) Dan Brickley
• Re: schema.org contentLocation question Jeff Mixter
• Re: schema.org contentLocation question Dan Brickley
• Re: schema.org contentLocation question Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: Official OWL version outdated Bo Ferri
• Re: schema.org contentLocation question Dan Brickley
• schema.org contentLocation question Jeff Mixter
• Re: Proposal: Promote 'citation' property up to CreativeWork Karen Coyle
• Re: Proposal: Promote 'citation' property up to CreativeWork MORITA Mizuki
• Re: Official OWL version outdated Bernard Vatant
• Re: Actions in Schema.org Jim Klo
• Re: Actions in Schema.org Dan Brickley
• Re: Actions in Schema.org James M Snell
• Re: Actions in Schema.org Dan Brickley
• Re: Actions in Schema.org James M Snell
• Re: Actions in Schema.org Dan Brickley

Tuesday, 14 May 2013

• Re: Proposal: Promote 'citation' property up to CreativeWork Karen Coyle
• Re: Offer data in separate places in HTML Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Offer data in separate places in HTML Lin Clark
• Re: Offer data in separate places in HTML Lin Clark
• Re: Offer data in separate places in HTML Robert Kost
• Re: Offer data in separate places in HTML Adrian Giurca
• Re: Offer data in separate places in HTML Martin Hepp
• Re: Offer data in separate places in HTML Robert Kost
• Re: Official OWL version outdated Martin Hepp
• Final CfP and deadline extension: 1st Intl. Workshop on Digital Preservation of Research Methods and Artefacts (DPRMA 2013) Raul Palma
• Vocabularies for BiologicalDataBaseEntry and BiologicalDatabase Maori Ito
• Re: Proposal: Promote 'citation' property up to CreativeWork Maori Ito

Monday, 13 May 2013

• Re: Official OWL version outdated Holger Knublauch
• Re: Official OWL version outdated Bernard Vatant
• marking up quotation types Quotations Book

Sunday, 12 May 2013

• Actions in Schema.org Jim Klo

Saturday, 11 May 2013

• Schema.org update: new and updated proposals Dan Brickley
• Re: Official OWL version outdated Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Official OWL version outdated Holger Knublauch

Thursday, 9 May 2013

• Re: Proposal: VisualArtwork Jeff Mixter
• Re: Proposal: VisualArtwork Paul Watson
• Re: ISSUE-17: schema.org has NGO, EducationalOrganization, SportsTeam, GovernmentOrganization but not Labo[u]r Union Barry Norton
• Re: ISSUE-17: schema.org has NGO, EducationalOrganization, SportsTeam, GovernmentOrganization but not Labo[u]r Union Kendall Clark
• Re: ISSUE-17: schema.org has NGO, EducationalOrganization, SportsTeam, GovernmentOrganization but not Labo[u]r Union Dan Brickley
• Re: Proposal: VisualArtwork Dan Brickley
• Re: ISSUE-17: schema.org has NGO, EducationalOrganization, SportsTeam, GovernmentOrganization but not Labo[u]r Union Kendall Clark

Wednesday, 8 May 2013

• Re: Proposal: Slideset William L. Anderson

Thursday, 9 May 2013

• Re: ISSUE-17: schema.org has NGO, EducationalOrganization, SportsTeam, GovernmentOrganization but not Labo[u]r Union Barry Norton
• Re: ISSUE-17: schema.org has NGO, EducationalOrganization, SportsTeam, GovernmentOrganization but not Labo[u]r Union Dan Brickley
• Re: schema.org proposal for extending Thing Dan Brickley
• Re: ISSUE-17: schema.org has NGO, EducationalOrganization, SportsTeam, GovernmentOrganization but not Labo[u]r Union Kendall Clark
• Re: ISSUE-17: schema.org has NGO, EducationalOrganization, SportsTeam, GovernmentOrganization but not Labo[u]r Union Eric Franzon
• Re: schema.org proposal for extending Thing Karen Coyle
• Re: ISSUE-17: schema.org has NGO, EducationalOrganization, SportsTeam, GovernmentOrganization but not Labo[u]r Union Thad Guidry
• Re: ISSUE-17: schema.org has NGO, EducationalOrganization, SportsTeam, GovernmentOrganization but not Labo[u]r Union Dan Brickley
• Re: ISSUE-17: schema.org has NGO, EducationalOrganization, SportsTeam, GovernmentOrganization but not Labo[u]r Union Kendall Clark
• Re: schema.org proposal for extending Thing Robert Schroeder
• Re: schema.org proposal for extending Thing Dan Brickley
• Re: schema.org proposal for extending Thing Robert Schroeder
• ISSUE-17: schema.org has NGO, EducationalOrganization, SportsTeam, GovernmentOrganization but not Labo[u]r Union Dan Brickley
• Re: schema.org proposal for extending Thing Dan Brickley
• Re: schema.org proposal for extending Thing Robert Schroeder
• Re: schema.org proposal for extending Thing Dan Brickley
• Re: schema.org proposal for extending Thing Robert Schroeder
• Re: schema.org proposal for extending Thing Wallis,Richard
• Re: schema.org proposal for extending Thing Justin Boyan
• Re: schema.org proposal for extending Thing Raj Singh
• Re: schema.org proposal for extending Thing Dan Brickley
• Re: Singularity: why has "children" not been renamed to "child"? Holger Knublauch
• Re: schema.org proposal for extending Thing Raj Singh
• Re: schema.org proposal for extending Thing Raj Singh
• Re: Singularity: why has "children" not been renamed to "child"? Dan Brickley

Wednesday, 8 May 2013

• Re: Singularity: why has "children" not been renamed to "child"? Holger Knublauch
• Re: Singularity: why has "children" not been renamed to "child"? Dan Brickley
• Re: schema.org proposal for extending Thing Dan Brickley
• Re: schema.org proposal for extending Thing Raj Singh
• webschema-ISSUE-21 (children -> child): Person type has 'children' property instead of 'child' [Feedback on Schema.org] Web Schemas TF Issue Tracker
• Singularity: why has "children" not been renamed to "child"? Holger Knublauch
• Re: schema.org proposal for extending Thing Dan Brickley
• Re: schema.org proposal for extending Thing Raj Singh
• Re: Proposal: Slideset Barry Norton
• Re: Proposal: Slideset Barry Norton
• Re: Proposal: Slideset Karen Coyle
• Re: Proposal: Slideset Barry Norton
• Re: Proposal: Slideset Dan Brickley
• Re: Proposal: Slideset Barry Norton
• Re: Proposal: Slideset Dan Brickley
• RE: Proposal: VisualArtwork Young,Jeff (OR)
• Re: Proposal: VisualArtwork Martin Hepp
• Re: Proposal: VisualArtwork Martin Hepp
• Proposal: Slideset Barry Norton
• RE: Proposal: VisualArtwork Young,Jeff (OR)
• Re: Proposal: Promote 'citation' property up to CreativeWork Martin Hepp
• Re: Proposal: VisualArtwork Paul Watson
• Re: Official OWL version outdated Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Official OWL version outdated Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Official OWL version outdated Holger Knublauch
• Re: Official OWL version outdated Dan Brickley
• Re: Proposal: Promote 'citation' property up to CreativeWork Thad Guidry
• Official OWL version outdated Holger Knublauch

Tuesday, 7 May 2013

• RE: Proposal: VisualArtwork Charlie Jiang
• Re: Proposal: VisualArtwork David F. Flanders
• Re: Proposal: VisualArtwork Guha
• Re: Proposal: VisualArtwork Paul Watson
• Re: Proposal: VisualArtwork Karen Coyle
• Re: Proposal: VisualArtwork Paul Watson
• Re: Proposal: VisualArtwork Paul Watson
• Re: Proposal: VisualArtwork Karen Coyle
• Proposal: VisualArtwork Paul Watson
• RE: Proposal: Collection Young,Jeff (OR)
• RE: Proposal: Collection Evain, Jean-Pierre
• Re: Proposal: Collection Wallis,Richard
• Re: Proposal: Collection Dan Brickley
• Proposal: Collection Wallis,Richard
• Re: Proposal: Promote 'citation' property up to CreativeWork Dan Brickley
• Re: Proposal: Promote 'citation' property up to CreativeWork Wallis,Richard

Friday, 3 May 2013

• Re: how to go about creating a new vocab? Kingsley Idehen
• RE: how to go about creating a new vocab? Marian, Radu
• Re: how to go about creating a new vocab? Diane Hillmann
• RE: how to go about creating a new vocab? Marian, Radu
• Re: how to go about creating a new vocab? Kingsley Idehen

Thursday, 2 May 2013

• Fwd: New vCard Ontology draft Renato Iannella
• RE: how to go about creating a new vocab? Marian, Radu
• Re: how to go about creating a new vocab? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: how to go about creating a new vocab? Sandro Hawke
• RE: how to go about creating a new vocab? Marian, Radu
• RE: how to go about creating a new vocab? LeVan,Ralph
• Re: how to go about creating a new vocab? Diane Hillmann
• RE: how to go about creating a new vocab? Marian, Radu
• RE: how to go about creating a new vocab? Thad Guidry
• RE: how to go about creating a new vocab? Marian, Radu
• Re: how to go about creating a new vocab? Alexey Zakhlestin
• how to go about creating a new vocab? Marian, Radu

Last message date: Friday, 31 May 2013 14:44:11 UTC