- From: Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 11:26:22 +0000
- To: "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
In reflection of the silence around this proposal - do I need to add it to a Wiki page or something? ~Richard On 22/03/2013 11:13, "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org> wrote: >This is the first proposal from the Schema Bib Extend >Group<http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/>, consisting of 60+ people >from a broad cross section of publishers, libraries, and others >interested in enhancing Schema.org's capabilities in the area of >bibliographic and associated resources. > >We are working on several proposals. However this appeared to be an >obvious, simple, uncontroversial proposal to start with. > >Proposal: >To promote the 'citation' property, currently on the >MedicalScholarlyArticle<http://schema.org/MedicalScholarlyArticle> Type, >up to the CreativeWork<http://schema.org/CreativeWork> Type. Many more >creative work types other than medical, or general, scholarly articles >can and do cite other works. > >Although the focus of our group's proposal is obviously bibliographic >works, this change could open up wider opportunities for web pages, music >(sampling of tracks?), art (description of a collage?), etc. > >More detail of the proposal is available on the group wiki: >http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Citation > >Regards, >Richard > > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 11:27:24 UTC